Useful law revision combines three jobs: remembering the law, distinguishing similar rules and applying them to a question. Reading and highlighting can help you get started, but you also need to find out what you can explain without the page in front of you.
Build your revision around retrieval practice, repeated visits to important topics and problems that require a reasoned answer. The aim is to identify and correct weaknesses while there is still time to work on them.
1. Retrieve the rule before checking it
Retrieval practice means attempting to remember something before seeing the answer. You might write the elements of an offence, explain a case or answer a question with your notes closed.
Research by Roediger and Karpicke found that testing on studied passages supported later retention. Include attempts at recall, rather than making every revision session another reading session. The experiments were not a guarantee of particular law-exam results. Study and abstract.
For a law topic, use three prompts:
- What is the rule?
- Which fact would make a different rule relevant?
- What authority supports the point?
Check immediately afterwards. An inaccurate answer that you correct is more informative than a page you have read without testing your understanding.
2. Return to topics on separate occasions
Spacing means distributing encounters with material across time. It does not mean progressively spending less time on each topic or always using an expanding interval.
Cepeda and colleagues found that the relationship between review gaps and later retention depended on the time until the final test. Adapt your schedule, rather than follow a single supposedly perfect pattern. Spacing study.
Begin with a realistic plan: revisit this week’s topic later in the week, then include it in a later mixed session. Bring weak topics back sooner. Do not remove a topic from revision permanently because you answered one question correctly.
3. Turn case notes into usable distinctions
A case note should help you recognise when an authority matters. A list containing only a case name, year and outcome often leaves the hardest part undone.
Compare these two notes:
Recognition note: “Carlill: smoke ball; advertisement; contract.”
Application note: “An advertisement can amount to an offer where its wording shows a sufficiently definite commitment to reward performance of stated conditions. Ask whether the new facts show that commitment, rather than assume every advertisement is an invitation to treat.”
The second note gives you something to use in a fresh problem. It is grounded in Carlill v Carbolic Smoke Ball Co [1893] 1 QB 256, but it does not require memorising every factual detail of the case.
When revising, cover the note and produce your own explanation. Then change a fact and consider whether the same authority still helps.
4. Practise application in the format you will face
For a written problem, explain the issue, the relevant rule, the facts pointing each way and your conclusion. For an essay, develop an argument that answers the proposition. For an MCQ, compare the options against the precise facts and the question being asked.
Use the same topic across several formats. After answering a contract MCQ, write two sentences explaining the result. Then identify the most tempting wrong answer and explain why it fails.
A correct answer reached by guesswork still needs review. Conversely, do not dismiss a wrong answer with “I knew that really”. Work out whether you missed a fact, confused the law or answered a different question.
Our law MCQ technique guide and problem-question guide cover those different demands.
5. Keep an error log that changes your next session
An error log should tell you what to do next. Try four columns: topic, mistake, correction and retest prompt.
“Got trusts wrong” is too broad. “Assumed joint legal ownership could never differ from beneficial ownership; revisit the starting presumption and evidence capable of rebutting it” identifies a specific task.
Keep entries short enough to revisit. If your log becomes a transcript of every explanation, choose the recurring mistakes and prioritise those.
A weekly routine you can adapt
| Session | Main task |
|---|---|
| First encounter | Understand the topic and make a short issue map |
| Next visit | Recall the rules, then check and correct them |
| Later in the week | Apply the topic to unfamiliar questions |
| Weekend review | Mix it with earlier topics and revisit errors |
Schedule longer timed work as the assessment approaches. A weekly routine should leave space for compulsory teaching, feedback and topics you find unexpectedly difficult.
Where guides and questions fit
Law Answered+ brings your revision together in one membership: access to all our guides and casebooks covering the full syllabus, with MCQ Master included. Move from understanding a topic to revising its key cases and testing yourself, with the full library available whenever you switch subjects. If question practice is your main need, MCQ Master is also available separately.
Whichever resources you use, make your next session specific: attempt, check, explain the mistake and return to it. A growing ability to handle new questions is a better sign of progress than a growing stack of highlighted pages.
Our worked case-card guide shows how to turn those authorities into practical recall prompts.
FREE GUIDE
How to master MCQs and smash your SQE exams
A refresher on how the SQE works, our step-by-step approach to MCQs, and exam-day tips.
Get the free guide